This review of a book about Victorian-era London restaurants is blowing my fucking mind

(soft paywalled, use the google cache or turn off JS to read the whole thing)

So a middle class Londoner in 1905 would have had access to dishes from India, Malaysia, China, Italy, Germany, Japan - fucking chicken katsu curry! Mary Poppins could have featured Mr. Banks going out for a curry and been perfectly cromulent. Wild

"There was an overlap between vegetarianism [in London in the 1890s] and the temperance movement, and these ‘fleshless’ restaurants were often also alcohol-free, serving lemonade or fruit juices instead. "

Fucking Victorian hipsters, am I right?

"[Spiers and Pond] was overseeing 211 railway buffet and refreshment rooms selling everything from slap-up dinners to two-shilling breakfasts to cold meals of veal and ham pie or sausage rolls and hard-boiled eggs".

Hell yeah. They apparently also invented the grab-a-ticket, pay-at-the-end system still used by Katz's deli in NYC.

"The London restaurant was, and remains, largely the creation of immigrants"

This is one reason why I literally cannot understand anti-immigrant sentiment. Even if I were a cold-hearted, purely selfish hedonist, who wouldn't want to live in a city with phở and sambusas and paneer curry and sushi and jerk chicken and lasagna and tacos and...

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!